C009 DAZN - Perform Investment Ltd.

Data Subject Rights
Case project
Filing DPA
Controller
DAZN - Perform Investment Ltd.
Case status
Partly Won
Filed: (5 years 2 months ago)

This case is part of a series of complaints on incomplete answers to access requests (a very common problem). These cases were also intended to develop further information on the functioning of the EU cooperation mechanism. So far, only one case has been decided.

Protocol
Date Summary
13.09.2023
DAZN provides recipients contact data as ordered by BVwG
06.09.2023
Decision by BVwG

Won re Art 15(1)(c) GDPR
Rest: procedure stopped, because DAZN provided missing info in course of procedure

30.08.2023
BVwG sends yet another submission by DAZN

Again, the BVwG did not ask us for another submission so we expect a decision soon.

22.08.2023
BVwG sends another submission by DAZN

BVwG did not ask us for another submission so we expect a decision soon.

10.08.2023
DAZN again provides some additional info
18.07.2023
Court asks DAZN to provide additional information

... in light of CJEU C-579/21

06.04.2023
Letter to BVwG

We argue more details are needed in order to meaningfully exercise GDPR rights

30.03.2023
DAZN names data recipients
23.03.2023
BVwG continues procedure on data recipients
22.12.2022
BVwG stays procedure for CJEU

Court waits until CJEU has decided in C-154/21

23.09.2022
Letter to BVwG

Sent ahead vie email, then registered letter. Requesting BVwG to not apply § 24(6) DSG and issue declaratory decision. Mentioning ongoing violation of Article 15(1)(c) GDPR (no concrete recipients)

09.09.2022
Notification by BVwG

We have 2 weeks to assess DAZN's reply to the SAR and to explain, why we still consider that the complainant's right under Article 15 GDPR is still violated.

06.09.2022
New SAR reply by DAZN

as requested by BVwG

09.08.2022
BVwG asked controller to give data subject access

This is not yet a decision on our inactivity complaint. The BVwG seems to offer the controller a chance to fulfil the SAR within 4 weeks, to then apply § 24(6) DSG and end the procedure without a formal decision.

27.04.2022
noyb Call with BVwG BVwG has received our inactivity complaint

Inacitvity complaint directly filed with BVwG due to the DSB ignoring it for over 3 months and refuses to send it. Complaint has been received by the BVwG.

19.04.2022
noyb informs DSB an appeal has been submitted directly with the BVWG
13.04.2022
Refiling inactivity complaint dirctly to BVwG

Sent the Säumnisbeschwerde to the BVwG directly via registered letter, as the DSB is not wordwaring it.

07.04.2022
BVwG responds
04.04.2022
DSB does not acknowledge receipt of the appeal noyb enquire further with BVwG
10.12.2021
No response is given so noyb files another appeal with DSB
13.09.2021
noyb follows up on previous request
10.06.2021
noyb asks the DSB to continue the investigation
25.11.2020
Decision of the Federal Administrative Court BVwG
18.09.2020
ICO communication

Content not clear

08.07.2020
DSB admits that is has no case number due to internal error and forwards the case to Federal Admin Court
04.06.2020
noyb appeals on inactivity
23.01.2020
noyb writes to DSB on several issues
23.01.2020
noyb writes to DSB on several issues
05.06.2019
noyb seeks update from DSB
26.04.2019
DSB responds and ensures further checks
15.04.2019
noyb seeks update from DSB
13.02.2019
noyb enquires on whether no suspension notice was issued in the present case also no case nr was assigned to the complaint
18.01.2019
Complaint filed