The case concerns data sharing between address publishers and credit ranking agencies. It does not involve the one-stop-shop and is treated as a national case by the Austrian DPA. Complaint is directed against both CRIF and AZ Direct.
| Date | Summary |
|---|---|
| 10.04.2024 | noyb statement re CRIF appeal due noyb filed its statement to BVwG regarding CRIF's appeal against the decision by the DSB. |
| 10.04.2024 | noyb submittsion re DSB statement due noyb filed its submission to BVwG regarding DSB's statement to noyb's appeal. |
| 20.03.2024 | BVwG provides us with appeal by CRIF BVwG provided us with CRIF's appeal against the decision by the DSB. |
| 20.03.2024 | DSB statement to noyb appeal BVwG provided us with DSB's statement to our appeal |
| 10.05.2023 | DSB notified us that CRIFs appeal has been forwarded to the BVwG |
| 18.04.2023 | Appeal by noyb |
| 24.03.2023 | DSB Decision re CRIF |
| 10.03.2023 | Phone Call with Mr Bogner BMWA |
| 09.03.2023 | Statement by noyb |
| 09.02.2023 | And yet another statement by CRIF |
| 18.01.2023 | Another statement by CRIF |
| 13.09.2022 | DSB has forwarded appeals to BVwG Both our appeal and AZ Direct's appeal are now with the BVwG. Further submisions must be filed with the BVwG directly. |
| 12.08.2022 | Appeal by noyb against DSB not banning the unlawful processing |
| 30.07.2022 | Name change data subject After noyb informed data subject about decision, he informed us that his surname is now Schuster-Stjepanovi?. |
| 29.07.2022 | DSB Decision re AZ Direct DSB held that AZ Direct violated Article 5(1)(b), 6(1) and (4) GDPR. |
| 16.05.2022 | Request for Update |
| 02.03.2022 | Update by DSB |
| 17.02.2022 | Repeated Request for Update |
| 22.11.2021 | Request for Update |
| 10.08.2021 | Reply noyb to CRIF and AZ reply |
| 13.07.2021 | Reply by AZ Direct |
| 13.07.2021 | Reply by CRIF |
| 18.03.2021 | Complaint Filed against both CRIF Austria and AZ Direct |