This case is part of a series of complaints on incomplete answers to access requests (a very common problem). These cases were also intended to develop further information on the functioning of the EU cooperation mechanism. So far, only one case has been decided.
| Date | Summary |
|---|---|
| 13.09.2023 | DAZN provides recipients contact data as ordered by BVwG |
| 06.09.2023 | Decision by BVwG Won re Art 15(1)(c) GDPR |
| 30.08.2023 | BVwG sends yet another submission by DAZN Again, the BVwG did not ask us for another submission so we expect a decision soon. |
| 22.08.2023 | BVwG sends another submission by DAZN BVwG did not ask us for another submission so we expect a decision soon. |
| 10.08.2023 | DAZN again provides some additional info |
| 18.07.2023 | Court asks DAZN to provide additional information ... in light of CJEU C-579/21 |
| 07.04.2023 | Letter to BVwG |
| 30.03.2023 | DAZN names data recipients |
| 23.03.2023 | BVwG continues procedure on data recipients |
| 22.12.2022 | BVwG stays procedure for C-154_21 until CJEU has decided |
| 31.08.2022 | Letter to BVwG Sent ahead vie email, then registered letter. |
| 19.08.2022 | Notification by BVwG We have 2 weeks to assess DAZN's reply to the SAR and to explain, why we still consider that the complainant's right under Article 15 GDPR is still violated. |
| 11.08.2022 | New SAR reply by DAZN as requested by BVwG |
| 15.07.2022 | BVwG asked controller to give data subject access This is not yet a decision on our inactivity complaint. The BVwG seems to offer the controller a chance to fulfil the SAR within 4 weeks, to then apply § 24(6) DSG and end the procedure without a formal decision. |
| 13.07.2022 | noyb Call with BVwG BVwG has received our inactivity complaint |
| 24.05.2022 | DSB Case has been forwarded to BVwG After we informed the DSB that we have filed the inactivity complaint directly with the BVwG, the DSB now notified us that they have forwarded the case files to the BVwG. Now we wait for the BVwG to decide. |
| 11.05.2022 | Refiling inactivity complaint dirctly to BVwG Refiling inactivity complaint (Säumnisbeschwerde) dirctly to BVwG as DSB did not foward it as required under the law. |
| 02.02.2022 | noyb files inactivity complaint |
| 19.11.2021 | update request with the DSB |
| 18.09.2020 | ICO confirms no case regarding the data subject is being processed |
| 16.09.2020 | noyb follows up with the ICO |
| 09.09.2020 | ICO does not have track of any proceeding so noyb enquires with the DSB |
| 09.09.2020 | ICO does not have track of any proceeding so noyb enquires with the DSB |
| 09.09.2020 | The DSB confirms information previously shared is correct and ICO must be wrong |
| 18.05.2020 | noyb seeks update from DSB |
| 23.01.2020 | noyb writes to DSB on several issues |
| 23.01.2020 | noyb writes to DSB on several issues |
| 10.10.2019 | noyb seeks update from DSB |
| 16.08.2019 | DSB confirms ICO is the LSA and communicates case details |
| 17.07.2019 | noyb forwards updated mandate to the DSB The mandate is cumulative for different companies. The controller is mentioned as "DAZN" and not "Perform Investment Ltd" |
| 28.06.2019 | DSB informs noyb on the progress |
| 05.06.2019 | noyb seeks update from DSB |
| 31.01.2019 | DSB stays the Procedure and finding LSA |
| 18.01.2019 | Complaint filed |