This is one of noyb 101 complaints which were filed after the "Schrems II" judgement in Summer 2020. The judgement invalidated the EU-US data transfer mechanism "Privacy Shield". The cases were generated based on implemented Google Analytics or Facebook tracking code on websites by EU providers, which leads to unlawful data transfers to the United States.
Date | Summary |
---|---|
21.07.2023 | noyb called the DPC and requested a status update |
06.07.2022 | DPC confirmed receipt DPC thanked us for sending original HAR file and the correct representation agreement. |
01.07.2022 | noyb sent the original HAR file noyb sent the original HAR file and the correct representation agreement to the DPC. |
27.06.2022 | DPC asked us to send the original HAR file DPC asked us to send the original HAR file and the correct representation agreement. |
14.06.2022 | Update by DPC This complaint was received by the DPC in July 2021 and is under active consideration. Further engagement will be required with the DC. Furthermore, before concluding this complaint the DPC will need to consider the forthcoming views of the EDPB Taskforce which is currently discussing complaints related to Facebook. |
21.02.2022 | noyb asked the Garante for an update |
27.10.2021 | Garante forwarded us a letter by the DPC Garante forwarded us a letter by the DPC, which states to have received our complaint on 05.07.2021 (i.e. almost eleven months after the filing). The DPC is now investigating the complaint. |
27.05.2021 | noyb wrote to the Garante confirming that the complainant is still interested in pursuing the complaint |
17.05.2021 | Garante stated to have triggered the Article 60 procedure Garante stated to have triggered the Article 60 procedure, asking us to confirm that the complainant is still interested in pursuing the complaint. |
20.01.2021 | noyb filed a submission asking the Garante to reconsider and forward the complaint to the competent LSA |
13.01.2021 | Garante rejected the complaint Garante rejected the complaint, because the data subject is based in Austria and the controller in Ireland; hence the Garante do not consider themselves competent. |
29.10.2020 | noyb asked for an update also requesting access to the case files |
07.10.2020 | noyb resubmitted all the five HAR files for the complaints lodged with the Garante |
10.09.2020 | Garante confirmed receipt of the complaint |
09.09.2020 | noyb asked Garante for a confirmation of receipt |
17.08.2020 | Complaint |