C029-39 Leroy Merlin

Data Transfers
Case project
Controller
Leroy Merlin
Case status
Pending (3 - 4 years)
Filed: (3 years 8 months ago)

This is one of noyb 101 complaints which were filed after the "Schrems II" judgement in Summer 2020. The judgement invalidated the EU-US data transfer mechanism "Privacy Shield". The cases were generated based on implemented Google Analytics or Facebook tracking code on websites by EU providers, which leads to unlawful data transfers to the United States.

Protocol
Date Summary
21.02.2022
noyb asked for an update
20.07.2021
CNIL informed us that the complaint continues to be under investigation
13.07.2021
noyb asked the CNIL for an update Du

noyb asked the CNIL for an update. Du to server errors on our end, noyb sent that message again on 15.07.2021.

22.12.2020
noyb wrote an email to the CNIL explaining how the HAR files showed the data transfers that took place
17.12.2020
CNIL asked us to make remarks on the case without providing us with the controllers statement

CNIL (referring to a phone call with noyb) again asked us to make remarks on the case (without us knowing the controller's submission) and reiterated their position not to share the case files with us.

10.12.2020
CNIL wrote us saying that the controller denies any wrongdoing

CNIL wrote us, saying that the controller has alleged that they have not implemented the Facebook connect feature, contrary to our complaint. CNIL gave noyb one month to respond with comments. noyb called them afterwards re access to the files of the case.

30.10.2020
CNIL replied that they are the the competent authority to begin investigating

CNIL replied that they are the competent authority to begin investigating. Cannot confirm that there will be no other supervisory authorities involved, however will let us know if there are. Do not want to disclose documents as they are 'administrative do

29.10.2020
noyb sent follow up email
06.10.2020
noyb resubmitted all six HAR files
04.09.2020
noyb resubmitted complaint

noyb resubmitted complaint in two separate emails as the attachments were to big and the email could not be delivered. On the same day, the CNIL aknowledged receipt of the complaint + attachments.

17.08.2020
Complaint