This is one of noyb 101 complaints which were filed after the "Schrems II" judgement in Summer 2020. The judgement invalidated the EU-US data transfer mechanism "Privacy Shield". The cases were generated based on implemented Google Analytics or Facebook tracking code on websites by EU providers, which leads to unlawful data transfers to the United States.
| Data | Podsumowanie |
|---|---|
| 05.12.2023 | DSB dismisses remaining part of complaint against Google LLC According to the DSB, the requirement od Google LLC to comply with U.S. surveillance law, does not lead to a violation within the meaning of Article 28(10) GDPR. |
| 25.09.2023 | BVwG serves us with the DSBs reply |
| 21.09.2023 | Reply to Googles Appeal |
| 21.08.2023 | appeal to supreme administrative court by Google |
| 05.07.2023 | BVwG provides written decision As announced in oral hearing. |
| 04.04.2023 | Einstellung Fristsetzungsverfahren |
| 10.03.2023 | Decision issued in oral hearing |
| 26.01.2023 | Sending the Privacy Policy of Geizhals to BVwG |
| 16.01.2023 | BVwG delivers various documents |
| 11.01.2023 | Oral hearing at BVwG |
| 02.01.2023 | BVwG sets deadline for all written statemens BVwG sets deadline for all written statemenst to 09.01.2023 |
| 02.01.2023 | Second oral hearing at BVwG |
| 20.12.2022 | VwGH sets deadline for BVwG to decide |
| 19.12.2022 | Request to change date of oral hearing |
| 19.12.2022 | noyb trying to have time for oral hearing and deadlines changed |
| 16.12.2022 | Information on oral hearding at BVwG Hearing on 11.01.2023 |
| 14.12.2022 | Application with VwGH to set deadline for BVwG |
| 12.12.2022 | VwGH sets deadline for BVwG to decide |
| 02.12.2022 | Application with VwGH to set deadline for BVwG |
| 22.11.2022 | Phone Call with BVwG re reference numbers of the appeals |
| 09.06.2022 | DSB informed us that Geizhals has filed an appel DSB informed us that Geizhals has filed an appeal and the appeal has been forwarded to the BVwG. Further corredpondence is with the BVwG. |
| 01.06.2022 | DSB notified us that Google LLC has DSB notified us that Google LLC has filed an appeal and the appeal has been forwarded to the BVwG. Further corredpondence is with the BVwG . |
| 10.05.2022 | DSB notified us about appeal being forwarded DSB notified us that our appeal has been forwarded to the BVwG and that and further corredpondence is with the BVwG . |
| 28.04.2022 | noyb filed our appeal |
| 25.04.2022 | DSB issued its decision DSB issued its decision. It is more or less a copy paste of C029-44 (Netdoktor), but with a few nice additions: a) IP anonymization is irrelevant, as it happens only on Google servers, b) risk based approach is not foreseen in GDPR. |
| 01.03.2022 | noyb filed our reply |
| 21.02.2022 | DSB sent us yet another statement by Google DSB sent us yet another statement by Google LLC and gave us 3 weesk to reply. |
| 03.12.2021 | noyb reply |
| 04.11.2021 | DSB sent us another statement by Google DSB sent us another statement by Google LLC, giving us 4 weeks to reply. |
| 22.09.2021 | DSB sent the actual reply of Geizhals DSB sent the actual reply of Geizhals. Nothing of relevance. noyb replied on the same day, that we do not have any comments at this point. |
| 21.09.2021 | DSB update DSB sent us a message that was supposed to include Geizhals' reply, but didn't and set a 4 week deadline to reply. noyb wrote the DSB, asking to be provided with the actual reply of Geizhals. |
| 26.07.2021 | DSB forwarded us Google LLCs state DSB forwarded us Google LLC's statement in C-29-44 (Netdoktor) which also applied here and gave us a 3 week deadline to reply. We will just refer to our replies there and add the info from the HAR file. |
| 08.06.2021 | noyb replied |
| 02.06.2021 | DSB update DSB also sent us this letter, giving us a 3 week deadline to reply. |
| 28.05.2021 | Geizhals lawyer update Geizhals' lawyer informed us about a message sent to the DSB stating that the controller has removed the code for analitics.js and requests informal end of procedure under § 24(6) DSG. |
| 13.03.2021 | noyb filed reply with the DSB |
| 12.02.2021 | noyb reply to the DSB |
| 15.01.2021 | DSB sent the missing reply DSB sent the missing reply from Geizhals. |
| 08.01.2021 | DSB upate We received an email from the DSB that was supposed to contain the Geizhals' reply. Wasn't attached. Asked for resending it. Deadline for our reply is 12.02.2021. |
| 25.11.2020 | Controller emailed again CEO emailed again, saying (1) they had fixed Art.49 consent, (2) updated the text in English, but claim they cannot find the "_gads" cookie that is dropped. noyb explained why we cannot withdraw. |
| 24.11.2020 | noyb emailed back noyb emailed back, pointing out the flaws in their website: (1) Art.49(1) consent not valid, (2) no English version of text on data-transfers, (3) "_gads" cookie is being set by google despite deactivating it. |
| 24.11.2020 | Geizhals emailed noyb |