The complaint is one of four complaints on "forced consent" (see C001 to C004) which were filed on Max 25th, 2018. The issue is that the user is forced to consent to the processing of their personal data to use the service. Therefore, such consent cannot be considered as free which is a condition under the GDPR.
It was filed in Belgium and forwarded to the Irish DPA (Irish DPA) as the lead supervisory authority.
ATTENTION: This case is not fully documented in the system
Päivämäärä | Summary |
---|---|
14.02.2024 | Judgement of Belgian Market Court The Belgian Market Court dismissed noyb's complaint and found the ADP's letter to be merely informative and not a decision that could be challenged before the MC. |
10.05.2023 | Answer from the APD on the registered letter before action to court |
31.03.2023 | Answer from the EDPB to noyb on the shift of legal basis from Meta |
31.03.2023 | Letter from noyb lawyers to APD pre-litigation court of appeal |
30.03.2023 | noyb email to the DPC about Meta announcement to shift legal basis |
02.02.2023 | Answer from the EDPB with the reasoned objections of the SAs |
18.01.2023 | Answer from the APD to noyb regarding the DPC decision |
17.01.2023 | letter from noyb on the fine issued by the DPC |
12.01.2023 | EDPB shares the links to EDPB Instagram and Facebook decisions |
12.01.2023 | Registration of the access request by the EDPB confirm registration of your access to documents request with respect to all objections raised in Article 65 GDPR procedures regarding Instagram and Facebook platforms. |
12.01.2023 | Letter from noyb to APD regarding the DPC decision |
12.01.2023 | Decision by the APD Notification to noyb of the DPC |
11.01.2023 | EDPB answers noyb on the access to documents |
06.01.2023 | noyb writes to the EDPB to have access to the documents of the file |
11.10.2022 | update on procedures from the DPC |
04.10.2022 | Request for Status of Complaints |
06.09.2022 | Letter to EDPB Access to Files |
26.08.2022 | APD says it will not answer last email from noyb Since the case has been sent to the EDPB, the APD will not answer the last email received from noyb |
23.08.2022 | APD informs noyb that the DPC sent the case to the EDPB under Article 65(&)(a) GDPR The EDPB is assessing now whether noyb should be heard |
10.08.2022 | noyb answer to APD Noyb still refuse to sign an NDA to access the additional documents of the case |
27.07.2022 | DCP letter on submission and access to the file |
30.06.2022 | Letter to APD on delay over CJEU and NDA |
27.06.2022 | Letter from the DCP via the APD on access to the file |
24.06.2022 | Letter from DPC |
13.04.2022 | Answer from the APD |
11.04.2022 | Answer from noyb to APD |
11.04.2022 | Letter from DPC on procedural rights |
01.04.2022 | DCP answer on the right to be heard by nob conditioned to DNA |
05.02.2022 | Letter to the DPC access to documents |
05.02.2022 | Submission on PPD |
29.12.2021 | Request from noyb |
23.12.2021 | DPC preliminary draft decision noyb receives the "preliminary draft decision" of the DPC |
07.09.2020 | noyb Request on Scope of Procedure |
19.08.2020 | Submission on Draft Report noyb sends its submission on the draft report of the DPC |
27.05.2020 | noyb Request to get the documents via AP |
25.05.2020 | Open Letter |
20.05.2020 | noyb Request after direct devlivery of report |
04.05.2020 | Request for an update by noyb |
28.04.2020 | Update by DPC via APD on ARQ Solicitor Letter |
12.03.2020 | Update by DPC via APD |
17.02.2020 | Email to APD |
25.11.2019 | Update by DPC |
15.11.2019 | Letter to DPC by ARQ |
14.11.2019 | Feedback by APD |
14.11.2019 | Mails to ARQ with everything to that date |
26.04.2019 | Info about letter from DPC |
19.04.2019 | Letter to DPC from noyb |
27.02.2019 | Letter to DPC on procedural issues |
19.02.2019 | Letter by noyb |
30.08.2018 | Acknowledgement by APD |
28.05.2018 | Complaint noyb files a complaint against Instagram in Belgium together with a complaint against WhatsApp in Germany and in |
25.05.2018 | Complaint filed Entry autogenerated, see NextCloud for details. |