This case is part of a series of complaints on incomplete answers to access requests (a very common problem). These cases were also intended to develop further information on the functioning of the EU cooperation mechanism. So far not a single case have been decided.
| Ημερομηνία | Summary |
|---|---|
| 27.02.2023 | noyb responds to DSB request |
| 17.02.2023 | DSB communicates IMY final investigation report and asks for noyb input |
| 31.01.2023 | noyb seeks and receives updates from Swedish lawfirm |
| 19.12.2022 | IMY appeals against the Court of Appeal rejection |
| 12.12.2022 | IMY appeals against the Court of Appeal rejection |
| 05.12.2022 | Court of Appeal rejects IMY appeal |
| 17.11.2022 | IMY appeals first instance decision |
| 01.11.2022 | Stockholm Court sides with noyb |
| 19.09.2022 | noyb appeals rejection by DSB |
| 22.08.2022 | DSB rejects submission of 8 June |
| 27.07.2022 | noyb replies to IMY submissions |
| 21.06.2022 | noyb files appeal against IMY before the Stockolm Admin Court |
| 08.06.2022 | noyb requires the DSB to take a position on IMY rejection |
| 02.06.2022 | IMY rejects noybs request to decide the matter Main reason to do so: noyb is not a party to the proceeding |
| 12.05.2022 | noyb sends IMY go ahead and decide letter |
| 11.05.2022 | noyb sends IMY go ahead and decide letter |
| 29.09.2021 | noyb seeks update from DSB noyb seeks update with the DSB |
| 19.01.2021 | IMY grants partial access to the file following noybs request |
| 18.01.2021 | IMY informs noyb about us not being party to the procedure and noyb files access to the IMY file |
| 18.01.2021 | noyb informs the DSB the accessed file is incomplete and request full access |
| 12.01.2021 | DSB grants access to the file following noyb request under 17 AVG |
| 01.01.2021 | back and forth between noyb and IMY check email exchange in the folder back and forth between noyb and IMY. |
| 10.07.2020 | noyb inquires whether IMY is going to formally handle the complaint Does this mean that our complaint is not being handled by the Swedish DPA but that a general audit of Spotify's policies, indepedent of our complaint, is being conducted instead? |
| 10.07.2020 | IMY informs noyb an audit on Spotify is being carried out In June 2019 the Swedish DPA initiated an audit as regards Spotify and how they handle data subjectsrequests pursuant to the right of access. The audit was initiated due to complaints concerning Spotify. The audit however focus on the general policies of the company in relation to the right of access and not on how the company has handled the specific request made by the complainants. Spotify has submitted an opinion on the 31th of July 2019, and a supplementing opinion on the 15th of November 2019. The Swedish DPA has not yet issued a decision in the case. |
| 09.07.2020 | noyb seeks update by IMY |
| 08.07.2020 | noyb seeks update with the LSA IMY replies |
| 18.05.2020 | noyb seeks update from DSB |
| 23.12.2019 | noyb requests access to the case file |
| 16.12.2019 | DSB informs noyb on the Status Following our previous update request the DSB informs us that they have forwarded the question to IMY and were told that the Swedish supervisory authority is conducting an ongoing investigation into spotify's guidelines with regard to the right of access. |
| 10.10.2019 | noyb seeks update by the DSB |
| 17.07.2019 | noyb provides the new mandate |
| 05.07.2019 | DSB requests new mandate and confirms IMY as LSA The procedure initiated at the same time to determine the lead supervisory authority (Art. 56 DSGVO) has shown that the Swedish supervisory authority (Data Inspection Board) will act as the supervisory authority in this case. The Swedish supervisory authority has initiated investigations (audit) against the respondent. |
| 05.06.2019 | noyb seeks update from DSB noyb requests whether a decision on the LSA has been reached |
| 06.05.2019 | noyb seeks update from DSB |
| 15.04.2019 | noyb seeks update from DSB |
| 31.01.2019 | DSB stays the Procedure and looks for LSA The DSB stays the procedure while the LSA has been identified. |
| 18.01.2019 | Complaint filed with DPA Complainant claims violation of Article 15 GDPR due to incomplete response provided by the controller. |