This is one of noyb 101 complaints which were filed after the "Schrems II" judgement in Summer 2020. The judgement invalidated the EU-US data transfer mechanism "Privacy Shield". The cases were generated based on implemented Google Analytics or Facebook tracking code on websites by EU providers, which leads to unlawful data transfers to the United States.
| Päivämäärä | Summary |
|---|---|
| 04.08.2022 | noyb calls the AP multiple times 26.07.2022: case manager is in a meeting but would call back (did not); |
| 07.03.2022 | AP informs us that the controller has replied to their questions but we must not see the replies AP informed us that the controller has replied to their inquiry on 12/03/2021 but the AP generelly does not share a controller's statement with a complainant during the investigation. |
| 17.02.2022 | noyb sends a third follow up email |
| 14.07.2021 | noyb sends another follow up email |
| 29.10.2020 | noyb sends a followup email to the AP |
| 09.10.2020 | AP states that the email address we used for filing is for media representatives AP stated that the email address we used for filing is for media representatives and that they will have a look at the matter. Later that day, the AP stated that said email address is no longer in use. |
| 09.10.2020 | noyb writes to the AP pointing out that all complaints habe been filed correctly and resends them noyb wrote to the AP pointing out that all complaints have been filed with the AP and that they might have ended up in a spam folder. noyb also sent (links to) the attachments of the complaints, including the HAR files. |
| 08.10.2020 | AP states that they have only received one complaint AP stated that they have only received complaint C029-37 (AP reference reference: z2020-14034) but not complaints C029-34, 36 and 94. They also pointed out an issue with the representation agreement (we might have sent an incorrect one). |
| 09.09.2020 | noyb sends a follow up message |
| 08.09.2020 | AP aknowledges receipt of the complaint |
| 17.08.2020 | Complaint |