One of the series of complaints on deceptive cookie banners.
| Fecha | Summary |
|---|---|
| 05.08.2024 | BVwG Decision Article 7(3) GDPR also means that refusing consent must be as easy as giving consent. A link is not comparable to a button. Media exemption is not applicable. Controller appeal is rejected. |
| 01.07.2024 | Submission noyb to BVwG Issues continue to be the same |
| 17.06.2024 | Controller submission to BVwG Still no reject option in the first layer |
| 27.05.2024 | BVwG visited the website to make its own assessment of the facts Possibility for a submission on its evidence finding |
| 27.05.2024 | noyb submission to BVwG |
| 14.02.2024 | noyb submission to BVwG |
| 31.01.2024 | BVwG sends appeal of controller Asks for submission of complainant |
| 16.01.2024 | DSB informs about controller appeal at BVwG |
| 14.12.2023 | Decision by DSB Order to adapt website |
| 13.09.2023 | noyb submission Market standard is not a legal argument. Violations are there again. |
| 17.05.2022 | noyb meeting with controller noyb had a meeting with the controller where the controller explained how OneTrust makes it impossible to disable the new types of cookies added to CMP from the default 'always active' function. |
| 05.03.2022 | Banner mostly fixed The banner has been fixed and the only violation Type I which is persistent is according to the Controller - 'a technical issue' which they are clarifying with OneTrust. |
| 04.03.2022 | DSB sent us the controller statement |
| 29.12.2021 | Submission sent to DSB Submission sent to DSB. |
| 02.12.2021 | DSB forwarded submission DSB forwarded the submission of the controller. |
| 05.10.2021 | DSB forwarded the complaint DSB forwarded the complaint to the respondent with a four-week deadline (ie till approx. 2 November 2021) to reply for them. |
| 10.08.2021 | Complaint filed |