The website profil.at does not accept users' refusal to certain tracking/advertising tools. If a user tries to reject everything in the 1st layer of the cookie banner, a 2nd layer appears telling the user that their "consent is mandatory". Users are forced to accept in order to be able to use the website. Furthermore it is impossible to withdraw this unlawful consent.
| Ημερομηνία | Summary |
|---|---|
| 12.06.2024 | Revisionsbeantwortung durch Profil |
| 11.06.2024 | Revisionsbeantwortung DSB Revision Antwort auf die Revision der DSB |
| 11.06.2024 | Revision VwGH Appeal to Supreme Administrative Court. Considering the court decision incorrect as consent was not freely given. |
| 13.05.2024 | Appeal by DPA to Supreme Court The DSB appealed the BVwG decision to the Supreme Administrative Court seeking to annul the decision of the BVwG. The DSB considers that no valid consent was given. |
| 30.04.2024 | BVwG Decision States in essence that there is a contract data against service |
| 15.01.2024 | noyb submission BVwG |
| 19.12.2023 | BVwG sends controller submission Claims GDPR not applicable |
| 28.11.2023 | DSB informs that case was appealed by controller at the BVwG |
| 10.08.2023 | Decision DSB No valid consent was obtained, the DSB orders the deletion of the data of the complainant and to adapt the cookie banner to the legal framework. |
| 04.07.2023 | DPA informed they will decide soon |
| 30.06.2023 | Update Request |
| 22.02.2023 | Submission noyb DSB is competent, legitimation to complain exists, no valid consent. |
| 01.02.2023 | Submission Profil Submission Profil: DSB is not competent because of media privileg, no legitimation, Profil ist profit-oriented, consent is valid. Answers to DSB questions. |
| 20.10.2022 | Complaint |